
Saint George slays the dragon
A couple of things I want to mention to my "coalition of the willing" three readership. 
***
First, about my Father.
Okay- one either has ambivalence, loathing or loves their father.
If we live more than one life in differing vessels that are the same soul- more or less- I really lucked out this time around. If we don't, then, shit!- what are the odds I should've been so lucky?!
Because of that- either of those "thats", as the case may be- I am really going to miss him.
I've actually been feeling fairly solid the last few days- but I've had moments when I know this is an illusion due to the fact that I have a few other things to preoccupy me.
My Dad would be the first to say that there's no point in dwelling on that which we can't change. And my Dad was even fairly specific about death being one of those things. Not that this awareness kept him from suffering, being misunderstood or allowed him a special dispensation to be congenial, generous and hilarious to the point of the more humble "silliness" we who were around him loved about him. In fact, without a doubt, the last few years have been very, very difficult to those around him.
But I think my Dad was a type of stoic- with a soft, sweet heart. He was a man's man in whatever might constitute a "true" sense of that term. Another term might be the Yiddishism, a "mensch". A man who was true to a code of honor, dignity and humility.
*
PLC and I were watching the Starz' networks new rendition of "Camelot" which we have been favorably impressed with. If for no other reason it's worth a look just to stare for a few at the newest young Arthur incarnation, an actor named Jamie Cambell Bower. The bar for the male "hubba hubba" factor for comely young blonde men has just been officially raised. But beyond a ravishing 21st century version of Arthur the writing and acting seem pretty decent. The romance, adventure and tragic fate of the Camelot legend deserves its place in Western storytelling in any format.
JAMIE CAMPBELL BOWER
But the other thing the Camelot story reminds me of is my father's love of heroes of yore, chainmailed or swashbuckling on behalf of the common man and virtue itself. He loved Robin Hood, Ivanhoe and in the comics, which along with radio and movies was much a part of the 30s and 40s culture of imaginative escapism and inspirational figures, Prince Valiant.
Of the latter my father loved the craftsmanship and elegance of the drawing style of Prince Valiant which was distinct from everything else at least in newspapers of the day as well as my day when I used to chance upon the comics section. (As for my youth I was strictly a "Mad Magazine", Archie-Veronica-Betty, Superman and The Flash kinda guy- but Dad and I both seemd equally amused with Popeye. The only thing better than being principled and chivalrous is being funny, principled and chivalrous.)
My father always preferred a more realistic slant to art, never an enthusiast of the avant garde or abstraction, he practised this same precision in his work with sheet metal and the objects he created in his spare time from metal and wood. My Mom has told me of the numerous times when she went to work wearing some of the earrings my father made for her that the other women always commented on them and asked where they could buy them. Copper and bronzes and brasses and enamels- especially in this era of sky high gold prices- are a wonderful alternative when properly crafted.
While my Dad could get his sensibilities affronted he was about as opposite of pretentious as you could imagine. My father had a sense of decorum and I later found out that he and I shared an interesting aspect in common, literally, if you were to talk to an astrologer : Venus in the sign of Leo at the time of birth.
Among the comments made regarding this planetary position are ; "Venus in Leo needs to feel that the person they have chosen has (a) special a destiny with them- and (they need) no matter how guarded- to feel the same for themselves. They are and must be proud of their love and those they love."
I suppose one way this might manifest might be the tendency to avoid anything that smacks of the "low" or "crass" in personal deportment and certainly in one's romantic interests or partner. There is even a tendency to put the beloved on the proverbial pedestal. And that may strike some as pretentious despite my protests to the contrary. But I guess I cut myself and my Dad some slack since I am hopelessly biased toward those who seem to value the "other" even at the risk of being more starry-eyed than pragmatic.
***
I've read a non-fiction book recently that seems about as meaningful and important as any I've read- ever.
This book has been out about 4 years and is called "The Shock Doctrine" and it's written by Naomi Klein. She is clearly a superb journalist, investigative reporter and a fine writer.
I left this thread snippet at another site where I had grown weary of the reflexive "humor" some folks seem to thrive on as to the differences between "liberals" and "conservatives".
"I don't usually say things like this but Naomi Klein's book is a revelation. It's not that many of the details haven't seen the light of day before- though I think a great many of those details and some essential facts have not- it's that the historical narrative has never been told with this exact linkage and causality. She has indicted the so-called "Chicago School" of unfettered marketplace economic theory, led by Milton Friedman, and posits that this philosophy has led to nothing less than rendering of human political and spiritual self-determination as superfluous and even detrimental to the "truths" of the marketplace- which, alone- must be the determinant in an allegedly "free" society. There is also a powerful linkage to the behavioristic psychological manifestation of the use of shock therapy in the 40s through the early 60s. Both Freidman's zealous advocates and the behaviorist accolytes of the post-World War II era share the naive desire to remake the human condition- individually and societally - from a "blank slate".
The essential fact from all of this is that there are no clear examples in which the supposedly unfettered virtues of the free market have been foisted upon cultures without an anti-democratic rationale and ultimately, means.
Klein has been criticised for making "facile" arguments by those who have an interest in seeing her version of our recent history not become a "talking point" of our current political discussion. I have yet to see any of them offer one serious critique she has not responded to with aplomb and an accuracy for the facts that none of them can match. There's a simple reason for that.
The right has long criticised the left- actually the Communist left- usually of Stalin or Mao- of attempting to assign a "scientific" measurement to its world view that is in contradiction to "human nature". "The Shock Doctrine" illustrates exactly how any inflexible political doctrine can lead to a similar or even more pervasive disaster. In the Friedman Free Market it has led to Corporate-military-bureaucratic facism. Right now that reality is imbedded in the American political fabric in undeniable fact and force.
Joe-bobcat sez, "go check it out". On that, I am not kidding. And I truly wish, for once, I were kidding."
As I read about the current budget maneuvering between the "liberals" and the "conservatives" in the US capitol as well as among the states, Wisconsin and Ohio for examples, the prominence of the "shock doctrine" as it has been practiced in the US on it's least wealthy citizens and on behalf of it's most prosperous couldn't be more obvious.
The Republican plan has been to gut the social welfare state in any form and to replace it with the Crapshoot of the Oligarchs that's continued to accelerate the impovershment of an ever-widening percentage of the world's peoples: bigger tax cuts yet for the corporations with allegiance to no one land and the richest 1-2% of the population, devolving successfully operated and funded entitlements like Social Security and Medicare into a sort of casino roulette of the so-called "Free Market".
The Democrats' plan has been, so far, to do the same but at a slightly slower pace with the occassional overt and outrageous betrayal that has allowed the mass consolidation of the largest banks, media empires and encouraged the ongoing collusion between the corporate and military revealing their hypocrisy in glaring highlight from time to time.

Bradley Manning
More evidence of the post-9/11 home grown "shock doctrine" is that Bradley Manning- alleged to be the source of some of the most damning Wikileaks reporting- has been held in captivity without legal recourse for a year while being intimidated and psychologically tortured, Guantanamo prison is still open amidst the myriad stories of many people who have been similarly detained- often for years without charges but with torture of the most extreme sort and without, obviously, any legal safeguards from "the land of the free" and the former head of Mubarak's secret police torturers in Egypt is now the head of state there.
The awful dilemma right now in America is that voting for a Republican is tantamount to encouraging this mass torture but is voting for a Democrat helping anyone? The thesis of the "shock doctrine" is alive and kicking in both major political parties and looks to thwart any actual alternative to what has clearly become a plan for disaster for every living thing on the planet.
Globalization. Guilty-until-proven-innocent. Greed. Gullibility.
These may as well be the current stand-ins for the Four Horsemen of the Apocalypse. Hopefully we don't need to consult a Mayan calendar to see what day we are in right now.
I've never been a big fan of conspiracy theories, but frankly you don't need a conspiracy when a basic philosophy is afoot that depends on imposing it's will on people in an anti-democratic fashion- and that is what "The Shock Doctrine" is really about.
Is there hope? Yes there is but it rests in the hands of all people who are doing something actively because they must and not necessarily because it's convenient. I'm as guilty as anyone else who feels daunted by that prospect and unfortunately a lot of those people in the Mid East who are compelled to expel their dictators and sever the ties to interested Western power brokers are about our best examples of this. Democracy is an event, or a series of events and it lives in those moments. The rest of our time is something else. We are witnessing what "something else" has led us to right now.
***
Naomi Klein
Recent Comments